
Continued from [PREVIOUS
PAGE]
Page 3 of 3
What
kinds of companies are in the portfolios you favor — high-tech,
low-tech or what?
Our
preference is to build a diversified portfolio, so we want to
have a variety of companies in the mix. This highlights one of
the advantages of a secondary fund, which is that we are able
to identify most of the companies in partnerships that we buy.
This gives us more control over the diversification in our partnerships.
What
has been the most common “exit path” for companies
in portfolios you acquire – the way value is unlocked
for distribution to investors? Initial Public Offerings (IPOs),
leveraged buyouts (LBOs), buyouts by larger companies, management
buybacks, or what? How do you expect this mix to evolve, and
why?
A: In terms of number of companies, most
of our portfolio companies will be acquired. While this has always
been the case, the huge upswing in the purchasing power of private
equity firms focused on buyouts is certainly increasing merger
activity. We’ve seen several recent instances where one
of our companies has been sold to another private equity firm.
We’ve also seen instances where a company will go through
the registration process for an IPO, only to be acquired before
the IPO is priced. We expect that most of our “home runs” in
future funds will come from companies that exit through an IPO,
and this is especially true in the case of venture capital-backed
companies.
How
important is the “execution” aspect of your work – all
the paperwork of making deals happen?
Doing
a sound job on valuation is probably our most important job,
but this is not to minimize the importance of executing successful
transfers. Once the valuations have been determined, there is
still the process of negotiating the purchase price with the
seller and documenting the terms and conditions of the transfer.
It’s vitally important to control the cost of the transfer
itself, since these costs are included in the cost of the investment
and ultimately the rate of return generated by our partnership.
We, along with our lawyers, have become quite adept at making
this process as efficient and cost-effective as possible. In
a previous partnership, we transferred 24 partnership interests
in 30 days, and in an orderly and efficient manner. It’s
critically important to manage this process efficiently, so that
it goes as smoothly as possible for sellers, many of whom may
be unfamiliar with the process. Our approach is to work closely
and openly with sellers, so that they understand our process
and are comfortable that they are receiving a fair price.
Does
being small give Symmetry some advantages vis-à-vis
the big players in the secondary market?
The
biggest difference besides scale (which is obvious) is focus.
As the giant funds and organizations have grown, they’ve
expanded their investments beyond secondaries. They acquire interests
in direct investments, primary private equity partnerships and
secondary real estate transactions, to name a few of their activities.
We have always believed that focus is an advantage for a small
firm, and we intend to continue to limit our activities to secondary
partnership investing in sectors that we already understand.
Are
there other things unique about Symmetry that I should know?
We
believe that our team’s experience is unique in our market
space. Our primary-partnership investing experience enables us
to assess the strength of fund general partners and the viability
of their investment strategies (our principals have committed
over $195 million to more than 45 primary partnerships). The
direct investing experience we both have, dating back to the
1980s, gives us an uncommon ability to value underlying assets
(companies) in funds we’re buying. Having purchased more
than 50 secondary interests over the years has given us deep
experience in finding and closing secondary market transactions.
No other group we know of has this breadth and depth of experience,
spanning several private equity market cycles. Finally, our commitment
to raising a series of small funds, rather than increasingly
larger ones, also makes us unique.
How
do I contact you?
You
can reach Marshall Greenwald in our Chicago office at 312-634-0925
or mgreenwald@symmetryfunds.com and
Larry Wonnacott in Denver at (303) 756-0274 or lwonnacott@symmetryfunds.com.
[PREVIOUS
PAGE]
|